托福考情速递两科原题命中！2025.9.17今托福两科均有原题命中！听力写作均命中！
01、考情速递
1、托福阅读考情
1.埃及金字塔
2.烟草病毒RNA
3.农业的起源
4.星体的形成
5.Greenland 移民的消失
6.Giant flying insects in Late Carboniferous Period
7.水生动物进化成陆地动物的一个种类，先讲鱼先发展出肺，因为干涸情况下腮会干掉，就发展出类肺器官，形成肺循环和体循环的双循环系统，也就是第一个adaptation，然后发展出可以在干涸的水溏里面走到岸上短期移动的limb，这是第二个adaptation
8.工业革命的，刚开始讲英国因为缺木头，没有办法像欧洲一样用木炭作为燃料，然后工业革命先从纺织品生意起步，但是迅速扩展到其他领域，然后蒸汽机首先被运用在高压水取煤，因为可以足够deep深
词汇题
relatively
2、托福听力考情
【第一套】
C1: 学生对欧洲15世纪的历史感兴趣，在写一篇关于亚瑟王相关的论文。
C2: 学生向老师咨询暑期活动策划实习，关于夏季科学展览活动。学生认为自己在生物专业的优势能够胜任这个岗位。
L1: 艺术类讲座。电影艺术中有“作者论”，也就是把导演作为电影中的主导地位。举例：经典电影《公民凯恩》
L2: 生态学，珊瑚礁和其生态系统。很多人会认为珊瑚是植物，但其实珊瑚是动物，由碳酸钙外骨骼构成珊瑚礁。珊瑚和藻细胞合作形成互利关系，但温度升高会导致珊瑚白化作用，破坏珊瑚。人类活动导致的过度捕鱼和水污染也都会珊瑚的恢复产生负面影响
L3: 不同的光对物品显示的颜色的影响，以穿袜子举例
【第二套】
C1: 观鸟俱乐部
C2: 和读书/小说相关
L1：关于石炭纪（carboniferous period）
L2：环境科学，提到澳洲的干旱和半干旱地区
L3：音机构赏，鼓作为乐器的由来
3、托福口语考情
A卷
Task 1
要不要在假期带电脑工作？Nowadays, since many jobs involve working and communicating on computers. it is possible for people to work even when they are not at their workplace. Because of this, while on vacation some people prefer to stay engaged with their workplace and check in periodically Others prefer not to think about work at all during vacation. Which approach do you think is better? Explain why, using details and examples in your response.
Task 2
reading room（混合态度）。
Task 3
植物针对特定动物的adaptation。
Task 4
人们使用volcano materials的方法：1. 在建筑方面，因为火山物质是light and durable的，所以很适合用于建筑材料，举例Romans and the Parthenon在建造的时候，将volcanic ashes混合在concrete里面，这样建造的屋顶轻便且牢固；2. 在农业方面，因为火山物质可以贮存一定水分，所以可以让土壤更肥沃，举例Hawaii islanders，当地人利用这样的土地来种了大面积的taro。
B卷
Task1
学生参加field trip和在课堂里学习，哪种方式更好？Some people think that students should attend field trips, like visiting a zoo, a museum, or a park; others believe that they should study in classrooms. Which do you think is the best way for students to learn?
Task 2学校要要叫一些名人来讲戏剧课，听力中不同意。
Task 3人们会把可能发生的最坏的情况提前想到，然后做一些应对措施。
Task 4动物适应寒冷环境的特征: 一种动物为了防止在雪中陷下去，脚趾很特别。
C卷
Task 1
一年级新生是否应该上课学习今后要用到的学校各种资源如何使用？Your university is planning to require all first-year students to take a class in which they would learn how to use the resources available at the university library and apply those skills in writing a long research paper. Do you think this is a good idea? Explain why or why not, using specific examples and details
4、托福写作考情
A卷
【综合写作】
交通摄像头与交警相比的利弊
阅读：Traffic Cameras有一些弊端。
1- 交通摄像头无法直接干预现场； 2- 交通摄像头不能被放置在所有地方； 3- 十字路口的交通摄像头甚至会导致一些交通事故；
听力：Traffic Cameras利大于弊。
1.对于现场的直接干涉不重要；更重要的是让有危险行为的驾驶员修正他们的行为；而最好的方式就是迫使他们交罚款。举例来说，当交警给超速的车开罚单的时候，其他超速的车可能会开过去。而交通摄像头会记录所有的违规行为，不会出现遗漏；所以尽管可能会有延迟，但是它通过更多的罚款对于驾驶员的危险行为进行了修正，同时比同区域的交警有更大的影响；
2.确实交警与交通摄像头都不能被放在所有地方，但这并不意味着它们是同等无效的。交警只能被配置于有限的区域因为成本比较高，交通摄像头相对来说成本更低，因此也就可以被放置在更多地方。所以交通摄像头使得监控更大比例的区域成为可能，这也会使得驾驶员更加遵循交通法规。
3. 放置在十字路口的交通摄像头确实造成了一些追尾事故。但是，事故的总数通常是很小的，摄像头有助于减少其他类型的交通事故。通常情况下，当司机在交叉路口无视交通灯信号或其他交通规则时，就会造成严重的正面或侧面碰撞。十字路口的摄像头让司机们更加小心，使得正面或侧面的严重碰撞更少。
【学术讨论】
Dr. Diaz
Many people would agree that teachers have a great responsibility.Today's question revolves around the role teachers are expected to play when teaching children. Some claim that a teacher's sole job should be to teach the school curriculum. Others argue that a teacher's responsibility also includes teaching manners that can help students function outside the classroom, such as being polite and respectful of others. Which view do you agree with and why?
Andrew
I think schools are already overloaded with a lot to do, so l would argue that teachers should always focus on curriculum since that is really what the role of schools is. I don't think it is the teacher's job to teach manners or behaviors to students because they will pick those up elsewhere.
Kelly
I agree with the view that a teacher's role extends beyond teaching the school curriculum. l think it is OK for teachers to help children pick up basic manners and behaviors, at least those expected from them in the class; otherwise, how would you expect children to interact appropriately with other children in the class?
B卷
【综合写作】
要不要在加拿大的五大湖建wind turbines
阅读认为要，有以下好处：
1：能给本地人提供工作岗位，促进经济发展
2：对比了海边建立风车和湖边建风车的成本，因为海水含盐，所以会腐蚀机器，而湖水是淡水，对turbine的伤害小
3：利用水能可以减少coal和gas的使用
听力一一反驳：
1：加大了本地财政的压力
2：水容易结冰会crack turbine
3：turbine需要使用的润滑油会排放一种物质导致水质下降无法饮用
【学术讨论】
Dr. Diaz
We've been talking about the process of starting anew business. One of the most important aspects of the process is staffing-that is, deciding which people to hire. Please discuss the following question: ls it better for new businesses to hire experienced veterans of the industry or to staff the business with younger employees who are right out of university? Why do you think so?
Claire
I think a company should staff a business with the most experienced employees possible. lf you're starting a new business, you need people around you who know what they are doing and can quickly get the business up to speed. Spending time training inexperienced people will slow you down.
Paul
I understand what Claire is saying, but if you are starting a new business, you want people who are particularly enthusiastic and energetic. Who better than a recent graduate to bring those qualities to the job? You would be guaranteed an ambitious hard worker.
C卷
【综合写作】
古罗马城镇遗迹庞贝古城挖掘出来就倒塌了
阅读：提出了导致该collapse的三个problems
1.因为有一些野鸟，他们会破坏能够保护walls的ash，也会留下一些酸性的droppings，毁坏墙壁
2.有一些非常不负责任的人，他们在参观的时候会偷一些chunk，但是没有足够的警卫去盯着他们，因为hire很多警卫太贵了
3.虽然它有个support，但是这个support并不会很管用
听力一一提出对应这三个问题的解决方案：
1.人们可以训一些hawks，然后这些老鹰在空中盘旋的时候，那些鸽子和野鸟就会看到它们，从而产生畏惧感，这样的话，这些鸟就会为了防止它们被捕食而逃走了
2.它们并不需要很多的警卫，因为这个世界上有很多对历史充满兴趣的人，即使不支付任何的金钱，他们也愿意来到这个庞贝古城的遗址来帮助这些游客进行一些教育，也可以同时盯着这些游客，因为由于他们的enthusiasm，这些人是不会允许游客去偷东西的
3. 倒塌的原因是因为这个support的组成部分里面有一些有害的化学物质，这些化学物质一旦被暴露出来，遇到水之后会跟水反应，从而导致墙坍塌。所以这些工程学家可以提供一种另外的化学物质，这个化学物质可以使这个墙非常稳定和安全
【学术讨论】
Dr. Diaz
Today, we're examining the environmental impact of short-haul flights—those under 500 kilometers. These flights often produce significantly higher emissions per passenger than trains or buses covering the same distance. With climate concerns growing, some governments are considering banning such flights when alternative transportation exists. This raises important questions about sustainability versus convenience. Do you think short flights should be banned when other transportation options are available? Why or why not?
Paul
I don't think short flights should be banned. In emergencies or for people with mobility issues, flights might be the only feasible option. For example, my grandfather can't handle long train rides. Instead of banning, we should focus on making flights greener and improving public transportation.
Claire
I believe short flights should be banned when alternatives like trains exist. Trains are more eco-friendly and often just as fast, considering airport wait times. Last summer, I took a train from Paris to Lyon instead of flying, and it was both comfortable and better for the environment.
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
