2025秋季辩题投票正式开启!快来投出宝贵一票!

上周迪迪发起了

秋季常规赛的辩题领域征集

一周的时间里大家踊跃提名

给我们提供了重要的参考

2025秋季常规赛PF辩题投票

将于今日正式开启!

本次辩题最终将落在

经济、能源、法律、科技

这些领域内

在此衷心感谢

所有参与辩题提名的同学、教练和裁判们!

今年秋季的备选辩题

包含多个领域

涵盖近期热点话题

大家快投出宝贵的一票吧!

2025秋季辩题投票正式开启!快来投出宝贵一票!

即日(7月28日)起,NHSDLC组委会将为辩手们开启2025秋季常规赛PF辩题投票通道。每人限1票。投票结束后,组委会将会进行票数核实与统计,并于8月6日通过官方公众号以及网站公布投票结果。

投票时间:7月28日 - 8月5日 17:00

投票方式:各位辩手可以通过文末二维码或公众号菜单栏参与辩题投票。

投票须知:一人限投一次,不同投票渠道不重复计票。

下面来具体了解本次的候选辩题吧~

#1

经济

Economics

Resolved:Latin American countries should prioritize intraregional trade over international trade.

拉丁美洲国家应优先发展区域内贸易而非国际贸易。

After years of exploring various trade policies, Latin American countries face the question: focus inward or venture outward? With the looming global trade wars in context, this puzzle becomes trickier.

Pro teams will argue that prioritizing intraregional trade will boost local economies, strengthen regional influence, and simplify trade regulations.

Con teams will counter that maintaining a focus on international trade yields global market opportunities, provides economic flexibility, and could bring greater long-term benefits.

Moreover, you might need to investigate different countries specifically to find out who is right.

#2

能源

Energy

Resolved: The United States should increase its use of nuclear energy for commercial energy production.

美国应增加核能在商业能源生产中的使用。

The United States faces growing energy demands, climate change concerns, and the need for reliable power sources. Nuclear energy presents a compelling solution, offering high energy output with minimal greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels. Despite its advantages, nuclear power remains controversial due to safety fears, waste disposal challenges, and high initial costs. On the other hand, the rise of nuclear power will inevitably lead to increasing competition with other types of clean energies such as renewables. Is nuclear energy the right solution at this point of US development?

#3

法律

Law

Resolved: The United States should abolish qualified immunity for police officers.

美国应废除警察的合格豁免权。

A nation at a legal crossroads, where the shield of qualified immunity for police officers faces a reckoning. Years after the policy was established, the debate rages on. Many past controversies centered around police abuse have brought us onto this debate today.

Pro teams should demand its abolition, envisioning a justice system that is more accountable and trustworthy for U.S. citizens.

The Con teams, however, should stand firm, warning that abolishing it could paralyze law enforcement with endless lawsuits.

Which side carves the path forward and ensures a safer world?

#4

科技

Technology

Resolved:China should prioritize investment in artificial intelligence over other emerging technologies.

中国应优先投资人工智能而非其他新兴技术。

The looming question, should China channel its resources into artificial intelligence, putting aside other emerging technologies? With a history of rapid innovation, China now weighs AI’s promise of economic supremacy and global leadership against the risks of neglecting a broader tech portfolio. Globally, a fleet of nations have joined the AI race, substantially increased their investments and applied the technologies to different sectors. The world starts to see AI as the more prominent future for human civilization. Pro teams will argue for AI’s transformative promise and potential, while con teams will caution against over-reliance, advocating for a diversified approach instead. What path should China pursue?

#5

科技

Technology

Resolved:Algorithmic content recommendation systems should be banned for minors.

应禁止向未成年人提供算法内容推荐系统。

Algorithmic content recommendation systems are heavily used by social media platforms nowadays, especially video platforms like TikTok and YouTube. Algorithms allow the platform to provide personalize content based on user behavior. While they increase engagement, promote efficiency for users to find content they prefer, and increase platforms' economic return, critics argue they can harm minors by promoting addictive usage, misinformation, or inappropriate content. This debate also focuses on minors, who on the one hand should be educated to utilize modern technologies better, but on the other hand need more protection for mental health. The topic challenges the debaters to balance technological growth and ethics.

【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信:mollywei007】

上一篇

DSE报名费疯涨一倍不止!背后真相竟是……

下一篇

伦敦大学学院申请攻略!申请者万千这所大众情校会偏爱谁?

你也可能喜欢

  • 暂无相关文章!

评论已经被关闭。

插入图片
返回顶部
Baidu
map